Good music! good music! this is another one from your favourite indegenious rapper L-SKIZZY and this one is tittled "All I Say" and if you love good music this one is for you...
Tuesday 19 April 2016
Sunday 17 April 2016
Favourite HBO Series Game Of Thrones Season 6 Back On April 24 2016
The sixth season of the fantasy drama television series Game of Thrones is scheduled to premiere on April 24, 2016
Saturday 16 April 2016
HOT MUSIC; MC Galaxy – “Sekem” (Remix) ft. Swizz Beatz
Watch out for the video, it’s going to be more than a hollywood movie.
Monday 4 April 2016
I have killed, buried 7 tricycle riders – Man confesses in Enugu
I have killed, buried 7 tricycle riders – Man confesses in EnuguBy Emmanuel Uzodinma on April 5, 2016
A middle-aged man, Nonso Azubuike, who specializes in stealing tricycles, popularly known as keke NAPEP, on Tuesday gave gruesome details on how he murders his victims.
The suspect, an indigene of Otolo in Nnewi, Anambra State, confessed that he relocated to Enugu from Abuja, alongside his accomplice, after they had killed five commercial motorcyclists.
According to him, “we operated for so long in Abuja but had to relocate when the situation became difficult. Before we left, we killed five okada riders in Nasarawa.
“Here in Enugu, we usually board a Keke, myself and my friend, Kennedy Ihunegbo, who is now dead; we will ask the Keke rider to take us to our building site at Ugwuaji; on getting there, we will ask him to help us load some items into the keke; once he bends down, one of us will use hammer and hit him on the head until he dies.
“We will now bury him in a shallow grave, which we usually dug at a building foundation within the Enugu-Port Harcourt Express Way.”
Earlier while parading him alongside other suspects at the Enugu State Police command’s headquarters, the commissioner of police, Nwodibo Ekechukwu, disclosed that Nonso and his accomplice, now late, escaped after committing similar act at keffi in Nasarawa State and relocated to Enugu early January, 2016.
The commissioner stated that the two suspects, initially engaged in crimes of killing commercial motorcycle riders in Abuja, adding that in 2014, they spread their operations to Nasarawa state and had stolen so many motorcycles mainly in Ado area of the state.
According to the CP, the duo commenced operations in January 2016, by stopping and entering tricycles at gun point, along Ogui road, Mosque area of Artisan and requesting the rider on each occasion to drop them at their purported building site along Ugwuaji, off the Enugu-PortHarcourt way.
“The modus operandi of the duo was to ask each tricycle operator conveying them to drop them at their purported building site, normally in a lonely place.
“They would then request the operator to carry blocks for them in the tricycle, to another location. The tricycle operator would be hit by them with a very big iron hammer on the head repeatedly as he bent to carry the block, till he died.
“This was the method used in killing their seven victims on two dates each in January and March, 2016 at various times of the day. In an instance, the head of one of the victims was shattered”, the commissioner further stated.
It was equally disclosed that after killing the victim, the suspects would forge a dealer receipt to convince prospective buyers and then sell the Keke at prices ranging from N205,000 to N350,000 at Enugu and Nnewi.
Meanwhile, the Police Command also paraded car snatchers, armed robbery suspects, pipeline vandals, assuring citizens of its commitment to make criminals uncomfortable in the State
A pre-election governorship candidate dispute -ENUGU
Though the 2015 governorship election in Enugu State, has been concluded and Governor Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi sworn-in, yet there are insinuations that echoes from the 2011 governorship election before it may still be haunting political stakeholders in the state. This is because of a 2011 gubernatorial pre-election case filed by Dr. Chukwuemeka Obechina of the PDP still pending at the Supreme Court which is due for hearing on Wednesday, April 6.
Obechina was an aspirant who filed a court case who filed a case against the PDP governorship candidate for that election, Chief Sullivan Chime who he claimed was not validly nominated.
Interestingly, the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC had in its submission also concurred with Obechina that the primaries that produced Chime as the PDP candidate was not validly nominated.
Interestingly, the case has inched through the processes and despite the exit of Chime from office in 2015, the case has yet to be concluded. Obechina in a chat alleged some suspicious hands involved in trying to frustrate the case. “The level of desperation to frustrate this case, if possible from being heard, is very worrisome and raises serious concerns to my supporters about my life. “I am making it clear that should anything strange happen to me, I hold those in government solely responsible as I have no other enemy.
They way they are going about this case is not noble and certainly outside the dictates of sustainable democracy. My only hope is in the Almighty God and on the fact that the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Mahmud Mohammed, a man of great simplicity and a legal icon of impeccable character, will lead our highly respected and equally impeccable Justices of the Supreme Court to boldly deliver justice to this case without fear or favour not minding whose horse is gored, as always shown in the past track records of their judgements.”
However, lawyers remain divided on the relevance of the case given that Chime has finished his term in office. Some argue that once four years had lapsed and another general election held, a pre- election case on it becomes academic. Among lawyers who hold this view is Mr. C. Egwu, who argued that ‘’a pre-election case in court becomes academic once a period of four years lapses and another person is elected into same office through a general election.
This is because the office under which the appellant seeks to serve has become spent.” However, another lawyer Mr. Henry Osigbemhe, differed saying that pre-election cases in courts are not time barred depending on the relief and office being sought in the court. Noting Section 64(1) of the 1999 Constitution which stipulates a four year period within which the Senate and the House of Representatives shall stand dissolved, he affirmed that the same was not applicable to executive offices. “Senators are merely elected to secure seats in the House. Thus if a person has a senatorial pre-election case and the suit is not determined and four years lapses from the date of the first sitting of the Senate, then the term of office upon which he was elected, if he wins the case, has lapsed as the Senate has been dissolved,” he argued. He added that “pre-election suits for the president and governors are not time barred as the Constitution donated the tenure of office to their lawfully elected individuals and not to the parties that sponsored them and not also to the House that has a fixed life span.
Besides, the Constitution further made the date for the taking of their Oath of Allegiance and Oath of Office indeterminate. But the pre-election cases for Senators, House of Representatives and State Assembly members and Area Council Chairmen in FCT are time barred if the House is dissolved and the relief sought in court is only political and does not include civil damages.
It will constitute great havoc to lump the provisions of sections 64(1), 105(1), 180(2) and 135(2) of our Constitution together and interpret them as if same provision. Such interpretation shall seriously violate the provisions, contents and the spirit of the Constitution. “The problem is that many people do not take pains to read our Constitution and see the different provisions for the various elective office holders in our country and thus tag all pre-election cases as time barred once another general election is held. Unfortunately too, a pre-election case involving presidential or gubernatorial election has not come up, after another general election, to the Supreme Court for an interesting and vibrant constitutional debate.
Obechina was an aspirant who filed a court case who filed a case against the PDP governorship candidate for that election, Chief Sullivan Chime who he claimed was not validly nominated.
Interestingly, the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC had in its submission also concurred with Obechina that the primaries that produced Chime as the PDP candidate was not validly nominated.
Interestingly, the case has inched through the processes and despite the exit of Chime from office in 2015, the case has yet to be concluded. Obechina in a chat alleged some suspicious hands involved in trying to frustrate the case. “The level of desperation to frustrate this case, if possible from being heard, is very worrisome and raises serious concerns to my supporters about my life. “I am making it clear that should anything strange happen to me, I hold those in government solely responsible as I have no other enemy.
They way they are going about this case is not noble and certainly outside the dictates of sustainable democracy. My only hope is in the Almighty God and on the fact that the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Mahmud Mohammed, a man of great simplicity and a legal icon of impeccable character, will lead our highly respected and equally impeccable Justices of the Supreme Court to boldly deliver justice to this case without fear or favour not minding whose horse is gored, as always shown in the past track records of their judgements.”
However, lawyers remain divided on the relevance of the case given that Chime has finished his term in office. Some argue that once four years had lapsed and another general election held, a pre- election case on it becomes academic. Among lawyers who hold this view is Mr. C. Egwu, who argued that ‘’a pre-election case in court becomes academic once a period of four years lapses and another person is elected into same office through a general election.
This is because the office under which the appellant seeks to serve has become spent.” However, another lawyer Mr. Henry Osigbemhe, differed saying that pre-election cases in courts are not time barred depending on the relief and office being sought in the court. Noting Section 64(1) of the 1999 Constitution which stipulates a four year period within which the Senate and the House of Representatives shall stand dissolved, he affirmed that the same was not applicable to executive offices. “Senators are merely elected to secure seats in the House. Thus if a person has a senatorial pre-election case and the suit is not determined and four years lapses from the date of the first sitting of the Senate, then the term of office upon which he was elected, if he wins the case, has lapsed as the Senate has been dissolved,” he argued. He added that “pre-election suits for the president and governors are not time barred as the Constitution donated the tenure of office to their lawfully elected individuals and not to the parties that sponsored them and not also to the House that has a fixed life span.
Besides, the Constitution further made the date for the taking of their Oath of Allegiance and Oath of Office indeterminate. But the pre-election cases for Senators, House of Representatives and State Assembly members and Area Council Chairmen in FCT are time barred if the House is dissolved and the relief sought in court is only political and does not include civil damages.
It will constitute great havoc to lump the provisions of sections 64(1), 105(1), 180(2) and 135(2) of our Constitution together and interpret them as if same provision. Such interpretation shall seriously violate the provisions, contents and the spirit of the Constitution. “The problem is that many people do not take pains to read our Constitution and see the different provisions for the various elective office holders in our country and thus tag all pre-election cases as time barred once another general election is held. Unfortunately too, a pre-election case involving presidential or gubernatorial election has not come up, after another general election, to the Supreme Court for an interesting and vibrant constitutional debate.
Buhari- We need to Reestablish Nigeria’s Integrity
President Muhammadu Buhari on Monday in Abuja explained why he had been
engaged in several foreign trips saying the country needs to
re-establish its integrity.
He stressed the urgent need to ensure that the potentials of Nigeria are harnessed and used for the good of the country.
Receiving the President of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), Bernard Aliyu, at the State House, Abuja, Mr. Buhari declared: “Nigeria needs to work on her potentials, so that we don’t remain permanently at the level of potentials”.
“If Ethiopia is sustained largely by her airline industry, we have greater potentials here. But we must move out, engage with the rest of the world, as we need to re-
The president recounted that for the greater part of the last 16 years, oil sold above $100 per barrel but expressed regret that the nation did not have much to show for it.
“In the First Republic, more enduring infrastructure was built with meagre resources. But in the past 16 years, we made a lot of money without planning for the rainy day.
“We showed a lot of indiscipline in managing our economy, and that is why we are where we are today. But this time round, we’ll do our best,” he said.
In his remark, Mr. Aliyu, the Nigerian-born ICAO president, commended Mr. Buhari for strides on anti- corruption, and urged Nigeria to pay more attention to development of civil aviation.
“Civil aviation is a catalyst for economic development. The level of aviation development in any country mirrors the economic development of that country,” Mr. Aliyu said.
The ICAO president pledged to support the development of the aviation industry in Nigeria, urging the country to improve on training and capacity development, aviation security, aerodromes and air navigation, runways, control towers, terminal buildings, among others
establish the integrity of this country. We need to rebuild this country again,” the president said.
He stressed the urgent need to ensure that the potentials of Nigeria are harnessed and used for the good of the country.
Receiving the President of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), Bernard Aliyu, at the State House, Abuja, Mr. Buhari declared: “Nigeria needs to work on her potentials, so that we don’t remain permanently at the level of potentials”.
“If Ethiopia is sustained largely by her airline industry, we have greater potentials here. But we must move out, engage with the rest of the world, as we need to re-
The president recounted that for the greater part of the last 16 years, oil sold above $100 per barrel but expressed regret that the nation did not have much to show for it.
“In the First Republic, more enduring infrastructure was built with meagre resources. But in the past 16 years, we made a lot of money without planning for the rainy day.
“We showed a lot of indiscipline in managing our economy, and that is why we are where we are today. But this time round, we’ll do our best,” he said.
In his remark, Mr. Aliyu, the Nigerian-born ICAO president, commended Mr. Buhari for strides on anti- corruption, and urged Nigeria to pay more attention to development of civil aviation.
“Civil aviation is a catalyst for economic development. The level of aviation development in any country mirrors the economic development of that country,” Mr. Aliyu said.
The ICAO president pledged to support the development of the aviation industry in Nigeria, urging the country to improve on training and capacity development, aviation security, aerodromes and air navigation, runways, control towers, terminal buildings, among others
No Going Back On Subsidy Removal – FG
The Federal Government, Monday, said it is not going back on its decision to remove subsidy from Premium Motor Spirit, also known as petrol. Specifically, the Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency, PPPRA, in a statement signed by its Acting Executive Secretary, Mrs. Sotonye Iyoyo, explained that what currently exists is the price modulation mechanism through which price of PMS is adjusted in line with market realities.
She said, “Contrary to reports by a Section of the Nigerian Media, the Federal Government has not reversed its decision to remove subsidy on Premium Motor Spirit (PMS), moreso when there is no appropriation for subsidy in the 2016 budget. “The PPPRA wishes to state categorically that what still exists is Price Modulation Policy, through which it considers and reviews pump price of PMS quarterly. “The Agency also wishes to assure Nigerians that the funds from Over-Recovery in the first quarter (Q1) shall be duly utilized for whatever noticeable imbalance in April 2016 in line with the Price Modulation Principle. “While appreciating the patience of Nigerians, the PPPRA wishes to reiterate its commitment to ensuring seamless supply and distribution of petroleum products in the Country.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)